Saturday, January 21, 2012

Tow-to-launch status?

Mike Kelly submitted two patents in 1997 and 2000 detailing a tow to launch architecture. Dryden teamed up with KST in the late 1990s for Eclipse, which demonstrated the concept's fundamental soundness for existing lifting bodies in the subsonic regime. KST (or a descendent team after it went belly up) pursued the X-Prize, lost, and apparently reconstituted under new management. Not sure what happened to Mike Kelly, or who owns the patents.

In any case, is there any particular reason why tow-to-launch hasn't been explored more vigorously? Not sure what the cost of the Eclipse test was, but the follow on contract went for $1.2 million at the time. Isn't this the sort of potentially low-cost, high trial rate approach to a problem that produces breakthroughs?

6 comments:

  1. Welcome back! I've missed your writings and insight. I guess you had to take a break like I did.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, it's been a while. Need to get in the habit of writing these things.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, me too. ;) If we were getting paid for doing this I'm sure we would be more prompt in our posts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i love to do both online shopping and online window shopping for goods and other stuffs* visit the site

    ReplyDelete
  5. So, the most obvious choice in this scenario is to goal for cost-recovery. Every submitted model is verified before being despatched to the 3D printer; therefore this 3D printing service guarantees to ship exceptional high quality. SD3D, a web-based 3D printing service business, offers a easy immediate quote software Travel Accessories for customers in need of 3D printed items. Fictiv is a multinational manufacturing company that additionally offers a 3D printing service. Fictive offers a low-cost 3D printing solution that comes in in} seven completely different materials. Since the early 2000s, Protolabs has served firms round the} world with 500 machines.

    ReplyDelete